Page 198 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 198

In the next chapter I focus on the epistemological aspects of this inquiry. I develop the

               notion of an institutional form of precarity wherein, through the process of making possible


               certain forms of knowledge and of life and ways of framing (which are connected to certain


               types  of  expertise),  other  forms  of  knowledge  and  of  life  and  ways  of  framing  become

               uncertain.  I  look  at  knowledge  and  expertise  more  closely  and  consider  the  precarious

               relationship between fishers and institutions and processes of legitimisation. This includes a


               return  to  the  discussion  of  the  term  traditional  knowledge.  My  inquiry  therefore  heads

               towards questions about where and how categories such as local/global, traditional/modern,


               sustainable/unsustainable,  nature/culture  are  enabled,  as  well  as  their  governing  effect.  I

               begin  to  draw  on  the  notion  of  governance,  broadly  understood  as  ‘systems  of  authority


               aimed at influencing or regulating people to behave in particular ways’ (Barclay 2016, p. 65).

               For  example,  let  us  take  the  term  culture.  Bennett  suggests  that  culture  has  become  a

               distinctive area of policy (e.g. four-pillar model of sustainability) in modern times (Bennett


               2013, pp. 278-279). This is because:



                        …of the ways in which policies aimed at influencing how cultural resources are
                        produced  and  distributed,  by  whom,  in  what  relationships  of  production  and
                        exchange, etc., can, through their influence on the relationships between different
                        ways of life, also provide a means of acting on the social. (Bennett 2013, pp. 278-
                        279)



               By  this  Bennett  does  not  mean  “society”  as  a  pre-given  realm  but  as  a  construct  of

               government – a realm of conducts and relationships that can be fashioned in certain ways


               through ‘specific forms of expertise that government mobilises’ (Bennett 2013, pp. 278-279).

               For my purposes, this involves exploring the ways that environmental governance acts on the


               social. This means considering not only how terms like sustainability, culture and tradition

               are mobilised, but how they operate in the field of governance to influence forms of knowing


               and  forms  of  life  in  tuna  fishing  communities  in  southern  Italy.  Thus,  articulating  the




                                                                                                      186
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203