Page 205 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 205

matter and is regarded as expert knowledge. What are the contexts and processes through

               which  some  experts  matter,  rendering  other  experts  (fishers)  less  relevant  in  defining  the


               terms  of  tuna  management,  culture  and  sustainability?  This  inquiry  helps  to  develop  our


               understanding of the productive capacity of sustainability.

                       To deepen this analysis we need to look at culture	as practices of knowledge, values

               and customs that are not always consciously experienced or articulated, while also viewing


               culture as a discursive and political tool that is mobilised in specific contexts, for example the

               use of the term traditional fishery or traditional knowledge. Returning to Bennett’s (2013)


               framework of the culture complex, we can think of culture as a term best understood in a

               historical context and as a series of knowledge practices, which are the ‘product of specific


               forms  of  expertise  performed  in  particular  institutional  settings’  (Bennett  2013,  p.  2).  My

               inquiry is into experts and institutions of culture and of nature (fishery scientists, universities,

               fishery  authorities,  social  scientists,  UN  and  EU)  as  well  as  those  intersecting  spaces  and


               moments, an example would be when fishery experts call upon the term culture.

                       Fishers,  scientists,  business  operators  and  observers  practice  diverse  forms  of


               knowledge in the tonnara. Annemarie Mol’s notion of interference helps us to think through

               knowledge conflicts and collaborations, and the epistemological and ontological changes in


               the  contemporary  tonnara.  Mol  suggests  that  reality  is  multiple  and  is  performed  and

               interfered with, rather than simply seen from different perspectives or constructed (1999, pp.


               76-77). In situations of multiple ways of knowing and being, some ways are rendered more

               stable than others. In San Pietro there were multiple realities of caring for and knowing tuna


               but  not  all  have  been  acknowledged  or  given  equal  opportunity  to  contribute  to  fishery

               management.

                       To analyse this situation I consider all knowledge to begin in a local context. That is,


               not only is knowledge contextual in geographical and scalar terms but also in terms of one’s




                                                                                                      193
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210