Page 286 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 286

reconfiguration of knowledge hierarchies.



                       In 2013 in San Pietro new ontologies were emerging. For most people, the experience

               was one of dissatisfaction with the present situation, while some experienced a widening of


               possibilities and others carried a sense of precariousness about the future. I focused on the

               mattanza in relation to quota and fierce competition for quota. Changes to the ontological


               dimensions of the tonnara itself were a focal point and I theorised this transformation arguing

               that  reality  is  multiple  and  performed,  and  interferences  can  occur  that  displace  some

               realities.  For  the  tonnara  to  function  and  continue  it  had  to  change  some  of  the  most


               fundamental aspects of its operations, namely the mattanza and post-harvest curing practices

               and  economy.  The  sustainability  situation  interfered  with  practices  of  harvesting,  curing,


               trading and tasting, as well as people’s sense of identity and forms of knowledge that were

               part  of  the  mattanza.  On  an  ontological  level  when  we  consider  the  tonnara  as  a  cultural


               fishing system, these changes question the very cultural and historic definition of the tonnara.

               This  approach  positioned  the  tonnara  as  constituted  through  relational  practices,  and  the


               people who participate in the tonnara, to varying degrees, as also constituted in part through

               relational practices. This framing positioned practice as the means through which relations


               are enacted and transformed. I argued that to practice mattanza or to process and preserve

               tuna is also to practice relationships among fishermen, and between fishermen and tuna. This

               argument  questions  whether  without  these  relationships  we  can  still  call  the  tonnara  a


               tonnara.  The  trap  as  the  point  of  capture  now  defines  the  tonnara.  This  particular

               transformation involving the addition of fattening ranches undermines the integrity of what is


               being  sustained  from  socio-economic,  cultural  and  ecological  perspectives,  highlighting  a

               paradox of the four-pillar model of sustainability. Again, this is an example of the productive


               capacity  of  sustainability  functioning  within  an  industry  driven  by  capitalist  concerns  to

               increase the value of tuna and to compensate for restricted quota.



                                                                                                      274
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291