Page 11 - Passalacqua_Peruzzi_Pellegrino2008
P. 11

TAXON 57 (3) • August 2008: 893–906         Passalacqua & al. • Biosystematics of the Jacobaea maritima group




                evidence, it is rather difficult to develop a well founded     Jacobaea maritima (L.) Pelser & Meijden subsp. sicula,
                hypothesis, but our suggestion is that genetic drift is the   subsp. nov.
                main evolutionary factor, even if it only started working   Diagnosis. – Differt ab J. maritima typica utrinque
                in recent times, thus the differentiation is very weak.  minore pubescentia, foliis supra saepe non araneosis, mi-
                    From a morphological point of view, J. maritima seems   nore involucris longitudine; differt ab J. maritima subsp.
                to be well differentiated from J. gibbosa and J. bicolor (Figs.   bicolor maiore involucris latitudine, minore capitulorum
                7A–B, 8), but not in the case of the Levanzo population   numero, foliis magis septatis.
                of J. bicolor, which is effectively intermediate in linking   Holotype. – SICILY: Sicilia, Isole Egadi, Levanzo, rupi
                J. maritima with J. bicolor (Figs. 4–7, 9; Tables 5–6). The   marittime, 17.VI.2002, Peruzzi & Passalacqua s.n. (CLU).
                Levanzo population tends to be distinguishable from J. mar-  Paratypes. – SICILY: Sicilia, 1831, Gussone s.n. (G-DC);
                itima by the lower stem and capitula hair covering (Table   Isola di Linosa (Sicilia), rupi marittime verso Cala della
                6), the less segmented leaves (Fig. 5A–B), and the smaller   Pozzolana, VII.1873, Aiuti s.n. (FI); Favignana, 15.IV.1973,
                involucre (Table 5). It is distinguishable from J. bicolor   Brullo s.n. (CAT); Isola Grande dello Stagnone, 20.VII.1974,
                by the more branched inflorescence (Fig. 9) and its size   Brullo s.n. (CAT); Marettimo 15.V.1982, Brullo s.n. (CAT);
                (Table 5), and the shorter stem (Fig. 6). Jacobaea bicolor   Madonnina Marettimo, 15.V.1982, Brullo s.n. (CAT); Capo
                and J. gibbosa retain their distinctness both in their overall   Libeccio Marettimo, 7.V.1982, Brullo s.n. (CAT); Linosa,
                morphology (Figs. 7–8), and using specific characters (stem   28.VI.1985, Spampinato s.n. (CAT); Lèvanzo, s.d., Todaro
                hairiness, capitula hairiness, Table 6). The morphological   s.n. (RO sub Senecio bicolor Tod.); MALTA: Dragunara
                similarity that links all investigated populations can prob-  Malta, VI.1973, Brullo s.n. (CAT); Mgarr ix-xihi, VI.1973,
                ably be explained by the recent genetic differentiation of   Brullo s.n. (CAT); Rampla Tar-Torri Malta, 26.VI.1973,
                units. The Levanzo population, showing affinity with both   Brullo & Ronsisvalle s.n. (CAT); Malta, Mjiebah (presso Se-
                J. bicolor and J. maritima, could be linked to genetic drift   linum Palace), 25.IX.1985, Brullo s.n. (CAT); Malta, Gozo,
                in the Levanzo population from J. maritima (or its ancestor)   Dwejra Point, 15.XI.1986, Brullo & Pavone s.n. (CAT); Ras
                overlapped by a recent genetic introgression from J. bicolor,   l-injieya, VI.1973, Brullo s.n. (CAT).
                but we did not find any molecular evidence in support of   Distribution. – Egadi Islands and Canal of Sicily
                this hypothesis and further research is needed.  (Malta, Gozo, Linosa). Preliminary observations carried
                                                                 out on plants from Croatia and Greece lead us to suspect
                                                                 that this name may also be applicable to Eastern Medi-
                                                                 terranean plants until now referred to J. maritima subsp.
                        CONCLUSIONS                              bicolor (Matthews, 1975). However, this matter requires
                    The combination of morphometric and molecular data   further investigation.
                showed little discriminating power. One of the aims of the   Habitat. – Coastal cliffs and rocks.
                work was to test the taxonomic setting of the group through
                morphometric and molecular research at population level.   Key to the Jacobaea maritima group in the Cen-
                The results highlighted the fact that the populations refer-  tral Mediterranean
                able to J. maritima s.l. (Table 2, populations 1–7) and to   (modified after Peruzzi & Passalacqua, 2003)
                J. ambigua s.l. (populations 8–9) are well differentiated   1.  Stems and involucres glabrous to glabrescent; involu-
                at the molecular level (Figs. 2–3), but less well so at the   cres 5 mm long or less  . . J. maritima subsp. gibbosa
                morphological (Figs. 4–6, 9, Tables 5–6). Nevertheless,   1.  Stems and involucres more or less hairy; involucres
                our observations on the auto-ecology and floral phenology   usually more than 5 mm long . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
                of these taxa suggest that interbreeding between these two   2.  Leaves septate (sometimes entire in young individu-
                units is unlikely at present, so that it is preferable to retain   als), with 5–12 segments; preferred habitat on coastal
                two separate species: Jacobaea maritima (L.) Pelser & Mei-  cliffs  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
                jden and Jacobaea ambigua (Biv.) Pelser & Meijden.  2.  Leaves lyrate to entire, with 0–5 segments; preferred
                    Within the two species, the delimitation of subspecies   habitat on hilly-mountainous screes (J. ambigua s.l.) 5
                is justified mainly based on geographical distribution,   3.  Leaves hardly septate, adaxial surface often with
                which is related to a certain degree of morphometrical   arachnoid hairs; involucres 5–6 mm wide; plants
                differentiation.                                     usually up to 70 cm tall, with fewer than 50 capitula
                    The overall taxonomic arrangement proposed by    to each stem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
                Peruzzi & al. (2006; see Introduction), therefore, can be   3.  Leaves septate to lobate, adaxial surface always
                maintained with one exception: the Levanzo population,   without arachnoid hairs; involucres 4–5 mm wide;
                previously referred to J. bicolor (under Senecio gibbosus   plants usually more than 70 cm tall, with more than
                subsp. bicolor, Peruzzi & Passalacqua, 2003), should be   50 capitula for each stem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                regarded as an independent subspecies.               . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .J. maritima subsp. bicolor

                                                                                                            903
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14