Page 4 - Power_Line_Cataliotti_2012
P. 4

CATALIOTTI et al.: PLC IN MV SYSTEM                                                                  65













         Fig. 7. Elementary cell of a transmission line.






                                                             Fig. 9. Per-unit-length inductance     versus frequency for the MV cables

                                                             with a cross section of 25 and 50 mm . Both frequency trends can be easily
                                                             assumed constants.









         Fig. 8. Per-unit-length resistance   versus frequency for the MV cables

         with a cross section of 25 and 50 mm . The experimental measurements were
         fitted with a second-order polynomial function.


         telegrapher’s equations which are, for the elementary line trans-
         mission cell shown in Fig. 7, the following:

                                                         (1)  Fig. 10. Per-unit-length conductance     versus frequency for the MV ca-

                                                             bles with a cross section of 25 and 50 mm .
                                                         (2)

           In these equations, denotes the longitudinal direction of the
         line and  ,  ,  , and  are the per-unit length resistance
         (   ), inductance (  ), conductance (  ) and capacitance
         (   ), respectively. In the time domain, the most popular nu-
         merical method applied to solve the telegrapher’s equations is
         the Bergeron one [11].
           The per-unit length parameters of two unipolar MV cables,
         type RG7H1R with an aluminum core cross section, respec-
         tively, of 25 and 50 mm , were measured according to the mea-
         surement procedure proposed in [7]. In Figs. 8–11, the measured
         parameters versus the frequency are plotted. Usually,  is ne-
         glected and only the distributed series resistance  is consid-
         ered to take into account the line losses [11]. As can be seen
                                                             Fig. 11. Per-unit-length capacitance   versus frequency for the MV cables
         from Fig. 8, the per-unit length resistance  is frequency de-
                                                             with a cross section of 25 and 50 mm . Both frequency trends can be easily
         pendent and a variation law versus frequency was obtained by  assumed constants.
         the experimental measurements [11].  versus the frequency
         trend in the case of the line-ground configuration was fitted by
         the following second-order polynomial function:     B. Coupling Networks

                                                         (3)   The signal injected and received in the MV cables is car-
                                                             ried out by a commercial coupling network (CN) based on the
           On the other hand, the per-unit length parameters  and  ohmic-capacitive divider. The frequency characterization of this
         are constant with the frequency, as can be observed from Figs. 9  network has been made by a vector network analyzer (VNA),
         and 11, respectively. In conclusion, the coefficients  ,  ,  and the RC values are included in the model. The 3-dB bandpass
           ,  , and  used for the simulations are reported in Table I.  of the used coupling network is 3 kHz centered on 86.7 kHz.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8