Page 16 - Sea-level change_2004
P. 16

ARTICLE IN PRESS
          1984                    K. Lambeck, A. Purcell / Quaternary Science Reviews 24 (2005) 1969–1988

          5.4. Co ˆte d’Azur, France                          the sea-level predictions during the Late Holocene
                                                              interval. Examples are illustratedin Fig. 11 for
           Perhaps the best Late Holocene recordfrom this     predictions along the Carmel coast and the Coˆ te d’Azur,
          locality is that inferredfrom the fossil vermetid and  two sites where the dependence on ice thickness is,
          coralline algae record(Laborel et al., 1994) which  respectively, least andgreatest. In these examples, the
                            14
          indicates that at  4 C ka BP levels were about 1.5 m  predictions for the preferred ice models for the two
          lower than today, and that from at least this time  northern regions (NE-2 andNA-2) (i) are compared
          onwards, sea level rose nearly uniformly to its present  with model predictions in which (ii) NE-2 is replaced by
          level. Vertical tectonic movement appears to be negli-  NE-1 only, (iii) NA2 is replacedby NA-1 only, and (iv)
          gible on the time scale of concern here (Dubar et al.,  both NE-2 andNA-2 are replacedby the larger-volume
          1992). The predicted Holocene values agree well with the  ice loads of NE-1 and NA-1, respectively. At the Carmel
          observed values and no modification of earth-model   coast, changes in predictions during the Late Holocene
          parameters appears warranted. The earth-model depen-  remain small, o1 m at 6 ka BP, andinsufficient to
          dence here is similar to that for Versilia and any change  change the general observation that the predictions are
          in earth-model parameters that may be suggested by the  systematically higher than the observedvalues. At the
          latter data would degrade the agreement with the    Coˆ te d’Azur site, the sensitivity of the prediction on ice
          observedrecordfor the past  3000 years.             loadis larger, consistent with the site occurring closer to
                                                              the ice loads, and reaches  2 m at 6 ka BP for the
                                                              modification of both ice sheets but here we see a
          5.5. Ice-load dependence                            potential for trade-off between lower-mantle viscosity
                                                              andice thickness (compare Figs. 9dand11b): increasing
           Across the region, increasing the ice loads over   ice thickness or increasing lower-mantle viscosity lower
          Europe and/or North America has the effect of lowering  the Late Holocene predictions at this site. However,
                                                              modifications of the ice sheets that lead to an substantial
                                                              increase in ice volume during the LGM and Late Glacial
                                                              intervals are inconsistent with the outcomes of inver-
                                                              sions of the rebounddata from the areas of former
                                                              glaciation.

                                                              5.6. Modification of the esl function

                                                                What the preliminary analysis indicates is that with
                                                              Dz esl ¼ 0 for to6.8 ka no choice of earth parameters
                                                              satisfies all the observational data sets. The modifica-
                                                              tions requiredfor the sites in the eastern Mediterranean
                                                              (Carmel coast andPeloponnisos) are at least partly
                                                              orthogonal to those requiredfor the western Mediterra-
                                                              nean sites (Versilia Plain andCoˆ te d’Azur). The
                                                              alternative solution is to attribute the discrepancies
                                                              between observations andpredictions noted above to
                                                              inadequacies of the esl function following the analysis
                                                              suggested by Eq. (5). The data discussed above is
                                                              inadequate to make precise estimates of the corrections
                                                              to this function as well as of the rheological parameters
                                                              but the trendis consistent with analyses carriedout for
                                                              other areas with the esl at  6.5 ka some 2–3 m less than
                                                              today and reaching the present-day levels at about 3000
                                                              years ago. This esl function (Fig. 12) implies that the
                                                              total ocean volume did not reach its present value until
                                                              about 3000 years ago andthat between  7000 and
                                                               3000 BP the ocean volume increasedsuch as to raise
                                                              the global level by 2.5–3 m (Lambeck, 2002). Whether
                                                              this is from melting of mountain glaciers or from
          Fig. 11. Predicted sea levels, at (a) the Carmel coast and (b) the Coˆ te
          d’Azur, for the nominal earth models and different combinations of  Antarctic melting, or whether it includes a thermal
          the two principal northern hemisphere ice sheets. The Antarctic and  expansion component cannot be establishedfrom this
          Alpine contributions are the same in all cases.     kindof analysis alone, but improvedanalyses of the
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20