Page 3 - Spatial _distribution_Brugnano_2010
P. 3

Author's personal copy




                                          C. Brugnano et al. / Journal of Marine Systems 81 (2010) 312–322     313
         Table 1
         Sampling stations, date, time sampling, start and end coordinates, bottom depth and number of collected samples.
           Station     Date          Time sampling    Coordinates                     Bottom depth    Collected samples
                                                                                      (m)
                                                      Start            End
           1           09/10/2004    07.58            Lat. 38°03.00N   38°01.84N      250             10
                                                      Lon.12°22.76E    12°22.39E
           2           09/10/2004    10.47            Lat. 37°58.50N   37°58.23N      48              4
                                                      Lon.12°22.94E    12°23.003E
           3           09/10/2004    11.54            Lat. 37°53.012N  37°52.934N     25              4
                                                      Lon.12°22.534E   12°21.87E
           4           09/10/2004    13.36            Lat. 37°54.82N   37°55.605N     87              6
                                                      Lon.12°14.99E    12°14.98E
           5           09/10/2004    15.04            Lat. 37°59.55N   38°00.456N     66              6
                                                      Lon.12°15.103E   12°15.139E
           6           09/10/2004    16.05            Lat. 38°03.075N  38°03.865N     86              7
                                                      Lon.12°14.976E   12°14.941E
           7           09/10/2004    18.02            Lat. 38°01.2N    38°03.018N     330             8
                                                      Lon.12°07.1E     12°07.086E
           8           10/10/2004    08.02            Lat. 37°56.853N  37°58.816N     88              7
                                                      Lon.12°07.236E   12°07.152E
           9           10/10/2004    09.40            Lat. 37°53.028N  37°53.922N     102             7
                                                      Lon.12°07.187E   12°07.19E
           10          10/10/2004    11.13            Lat. 37°52.670N  37°55.55N      630             9
                                                      Lon.12°00.10E    11°59.983E
           11          10/10/2004    14.13            Lat. 37°57.874N  37°59.482N     310             9
                                                      Lon.12°00.024E   12°00.068E
           12          10/10/2004    15.30            Lat. 38°02.77N   38°04.4N       355             10
                                                      Lon.12°00.042E   12°00.175E



         located along inshore–offshore sections in front of Sicily coastline and  MAW eastwards and entering the Tyrrhenian Sea (Astraldi et al.,
         crossing throughout Marettimo, Favignana and Levanzo Islands.  1996) from the Sardinia Channel, and the LIW, produced in the
         Stations 2 and 3 placed within 50 m isobath were considered coastal;  Eastern Mediterranean Sea and settled itself at a depth of 100–200 m,
         stations 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9, on the continental shelf among the islands,  spreading out towards the west, after crossing the Sicily Channel. The
         neritic; and the pelagic stations 1, 7, 10, 11, 12, located outside 200 m  topographic features constrain LIW flow to turn eastwards and enter
         isobath. Zooplankton samplings were carried out by the electronic  the Tyrrhenian Sea across a section offshore the Egadi Islands. Here,
                                       2
         multinet BIONESS. The BIONESS (0.25 m mouth area and equipped  the eastern outflow is composed by a unique vein constituted by an
         with 10 nets of 200 µm mesh size) was towed at a speed of 1–1.5 m/s.  upper part, between 300 and 650 m, and a lower part down to 1100 m
         Depending on the bottom depth, samples were collected at 5–10–20–  flowing very close to Sicily slope (Sparnocchia et al., 1999).
         50–100 m intervals of the water column. Samplings were performed
         during the daytime. Simultaneously to the zooplankton samplings,  2.2. Data analysis
         some environmental parameters were measured by a multi-
         parameter probe (Seabird 911Plus): temperatures (°C), salinity,  2.2.1. Multivariate analysis
         dissolved oxygen (mg/L) and fluorescence. Fluorescence was  Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on Euclidean
         measured and calculated as equivalent μgChl-a L  − 1 . The conven-  distances of physico-chemical data, previously log-transformed and
         tional unit (F) for in vivo fluorescence in the range of 0–10V  normalized. To explore spatial distribution pattern of copepod
                             3
         corresponds to 0–50 mg/m for Chl-a with a resolution of 0.1 mg/m 3  community, cluster analysis was applied. Similarities among samples
         and an accuracy variability of less than 10%.         were estimated by Bray–Curtis similarity index and clustering of
            On board, the samples were preserved in a 4% buffered form-  samples was performed using group average linkage. Species
         aldehyde and sea water solution. In the laboratory, a qualitative-  assemblages were identified using the same analysis by clustering
         quantitative analysis of meso-zooplankton was performed on sub-  of variables and taking into account only those species that
         samples ranging from 1/10 to 1/25, depending on the total sample  contributed at least for 5% of total abundance. Abundance data were
         abundance, while the whole samples were observed for the  transformed using the square root function to allow the less abundant
         identification of rare species. Adult copepods were counted and  species to exert some influence on the calculation of similarities.
         identified at species level, while the copepodite stages at genus level.  Because samples were collected at different depth intervals, they were
         Abundance was expressed as individuals per cubic meter (ind.m −3 ).  grouped and named “A” (0–20 m layer), “A*” (20–40 m layer), “B”
                                                               (40–60 m layer), “C” (60–80 m layer), “D” (80–100 m layer), “E”
         2.1. Study area                                       (100–200 m layer), “F” (200–300 m layer) and “G” (groups all
                                                               the intervals greater than 300 m). Similarity percentage analyses
            Egadi Archipelago (Fig. 1) is constituted by Marettimo, Levanzo  (SIMPER) were used to identify those species that contributed most
         and Favignana Islands. This area represents the highest part of a wide  to similarities between groups and across positions. Primer Beta 6
         submarine canyon, by which Sicilian continental shelf is connected to  package was used for all of the above-mentioned analysis. All these
         abyssal plane of Tyrrhenian Sea (Colantoni et al., 1993). Sicilian  analysis were performed only on adult copepods.
         continental shelf is very broad in front of Trapani coastline and
         becomes narrower between Levanzo and Marettimo. The northern  2.2.2. Univariate analysis
         part of this zone shows a drop from which continental slope begins  Moreover, some aspects of biodiversity were evaluated by using
         and, in a short space, reaches and exceeds 1000 m depth. In this area,  species richness (d) and Shannon–Wiener index (H′)(Shannon and
         at the entrance of Sicily Channel, surface circulation is mainly  Weaver, 1963). These indices were calculated averaging abundance
         characterized by two water masses flowing in opposite directions:  data of adult copepods every 20 m intervals from 0 to 100 m and
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8