Page 161 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 161

local harvest and tuna economy) and the introduction of a system that transfers the majority

               of tuna live in a cage to transport to Maltese fattening ranches and then on to Japan for sale, is


               one  of  the  most  significant  transformations  that  the  tonnara,  as  a  socio-techno-ecological


               fishing system, has undergone. This chapter will begin to examine how fishery regulations,

               such as quota in particular, have been important in curbing the decline in tuna stock, yet have

               adversely impacted the tonnara on numerous socio-cultural and ecological levels.


                       I  draw  on  the  neologism  “dingpolitik”  and  Bruno  Latour’s  notion  of  matters  of

               concern  to  frame  the  core  issues,  objects  and  subjects  of  this  chapter,  adding  nuance  to


               matters of concern with the affective terms, care and conflict. I define these terms in the next

               section. The meta-narrative of the chapter is that the gathering of diverse participants around


               the dingpolitiks – tuna, sustainability and the tonnara – is a local formation and part of a

               wider sustainability assemblage. Furthermore, the recent changes and the conditions in which

               the tonnara finds itself are part of that assemblage. From the midst of this situation I argue


               that  the  tonnara  owners  have  instigated  the  changes  in  response  to  a  range  of  conditions

               formed through a sustainability assemblage.




               Dingpolitik: Matters of Concern, Care and Conflict


               The  German  neologism  dingpolitik  helps  us  to  understand  the  gathering	 in  San  Pietro  in


               2013. A gathering that brought together and at times divided a mix of people.  The word

               “thing” (German ding) originally designated a particular archaic assembly (Latour 2005, p.


               12).  For  many  centuries  it  ‘meant  the  issue  that  brings  people  together  because  it  divides

               them’ (Latour 2005, p. 13). Gísli Pálsson (2005, p. 250) says that in Iceland the word ping

                                                                              th
               denotes an object as well as a gathering or an assembly. In the 9  century the parliament was

               referred  to  as  “al-thing”  or  “alping”  (Pálsson  2005,  p.  250).  There  are  many  Nordic  and

               Saxon  examples  that  draw  on  the  etymology  of  the  word  thing  to  indicate  a  political




                                                                                                      149
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166