Page 166 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 166

individual  bird  in  reproductive  practices  of  conservation.  In  addressing  the  dilemma  of

               sustaining fish and fishing cultures it might help to understand how we care and what kinds


               of consequences our caring has.  Perhaps some important questions are: ‘what forms of care


               are  most  effective...how  do  we  come  to  care,  and  which  types  of  care  have  the  desired

               effects?’  (Probyn  2014b,  p.  296).  Another  reason  for  thinking  about  care  is  that  care

               augments the affective and ethical connotations of matters of concern. Latour himself used


               care to direct attention to the importance of caring for technologies, even those we view as

               failures  or  know  as  unethical  (Bellacasa  2011,  p.  90).  Recalling  the  moral  story  of


               Frankenstein, Bellacasa says that:



                        …caring  for  technology  carries  well  the  double  significance  of  care  as  an
                        everyday labour of maintenance that is also an ethical obligation: we must take
                        care of things in order to remain responsible for their becomings. (2011, p. 90)



               The fishery quota system comes to mind as a relevant example of the importance of care and


               responsibility  in  relation  to  an  intervention.  What  are  our  responsibilities  towards  the

               unintended  and  undesired  social  and  ecological  outcomes  of  this  system  of  tuna

               conservation?


                       For  the  reasons  just  outlined  I  situate  tuna,  sustainability  and  the  tonnara  as  three

               dingpolitik.  Tuna,  sustainability  and  the  tonnara  are  more  than  matters  of  facts,  but  are


               matters of concern, care and conflict.  In the next three sections I explore each matter in turn

               and keep the following questions in mind: How might a matter of concern, care and conflict


               approach  reframe  the  issue  of  tuna  conservation?  What  kinds  of  social  and  cultural

               considerations might we include when we see matters of facts and matters of concerns as co-


               productive?  How  might  this  understanding  help  us  cultivate  an  integrated  model  of

               sustainability? And how might we understand the role of these affective registers – conflict,


               concern and care – in relation to a sustainability assemblage and process of assembling?


                                                                                                      154
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171