Page 163 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 163
Like many environmental conflicts around the world, tuna in San Pietro in 2013 was certainly
more than a matter of fact: it aroused passions, raised many concerns, and was at the centre of
much conflict and diverse practices of care. This does not mean that the production of
scientific data is irrelevant, but rather it is a reminder of the social context and situated
concerns within which those facts exist. Dingpolitik as a science and technology studies
intervention may be a more realistic way to understand and respond to the issues surrounding
tuna and the tonnara. It offers an opportunity to reframe tuna, sustainability and the tonnara
as matters at the centre of much concern and conflict. It offers a chance to pay attention to
diverse motivations and positions of concern. It also offers an opportunity within
sustainability debates, to understand the context through which fish facts are produced and
issues are presented and represented (or sidelined) as though objective and value-free.
The term environmental conflict is the more common framework that acknowledges
diverse positions as well as social and political dimensions of an environmental issue. In the
realm of environmental management it goes some way to allow the debate to go beyond an
ecological or matter of fact framing (Carss et al. in Young et al. 2010, p. 3974). For example,
Young et al. (2010, pp. 3979-3980) bring together a topology of six conflict areas:
- Conflicts over beliefs and values, where differences exists over normative
perceptions;
- Conflicts of interest, when two groups want different things from the same
habitat or species;
- Conflicts over process, relating to the different approaches to decision-making
and fairness taken by different people, groups, or agencies;
- Conflicts over information, relating to situations where data are lacking,
misunderstood, or perceived in different ways by different actors;
- Structural conflicts referring to social, legal, economic and cultural
arrangements;
- Inter-personal conflicts relating to personality differences between individuals
or groups, including issues of communication and mistrust.
151