Page 163 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 163

Like many environmental conflicts around the world, tuna in San Pietro in 2013 was certainly


               more than a matter of fact: it aroused passions, raised many concerns, and was at the centre of


               much  conflict  and  diverse  practices  of  care.  This  does  not  mean  that  the  production  of

               scientific  data  is  irrelevant,  but  rather  it  is  a  reminder  of  the  social  context  and  situated

               concerns  within  which  those  facts  exist.  Dingpolitik  as  a  science  and  technology  studies


               intervention may be a more realistic way to understand and respond to the issues surrounding

               tuna and the tonnara. It offers an opportunity to reframe tuna, sustainability and the tonnara


               as matters at the centre of much concern and conflict. It offers a chance to pay attention to

               diverse  motivations  and  positions  of  concern.  It  also  offers  an  opportunity  within


               sustainability debates, to understand the context through which fish facts are produced and

               issues are presented and represented (or sidelined) as though objective and value-free.

                       The term environmental conflict is the more common framework that acknowledges


               diverse positions as well as social and political dimensions of an environmental issue. In the

               realm of environmental management it goes some way to allow the debate to go beyond an


               ecological or matter of fact framing (Carss et al. in Young et al.  2010, p. 3974). For example,

               Young et al. (2010, pp. 3979-3980) bring together a topology of six conflict areas:



                        -   Conflicts over beliefs and values, where differences exists over normative
                            perceptions;
                        -   Conflicts of interest, when two groups want different things from the same
                            habitat or species;

                        -   Conflicts over process, relating to the different approaches to decision-making
                            and fairness taken by different people, groups, or agencies;

                        -   Conflicts over information, relating to situations where data are lacking,
                            misunderstood, or perceived in different ways by different actors;

                        -   Structural conflicts referring to social, legal, economic and cultural
                            arrangements;

                        -   Inter-personal conflicts relating to personality differences between individuals
                            or groups, including issues of communication and mistrust.



                                                                                                      151
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168