Page 164 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 164

In  San  Pietro  and  Favignana,  and  within  wider  sustainable  tuna  debates,  conflicts


               occur  over  the  process  of  regulations,  management  decisions,  data  used  to  estimate  stock,


               quota allocation, fairness, and beliefs about what is and is not cruel or what is and is not

               sustainable.  Environmental  conflicts  often  arise  through  diverse  social  and  ethical

               investments  (conservation,  labour,  tradition  or  animal  welfare).  The  question  of  whose


               knowledge matters and how certain knowledge systems present an issue is also relevant to the

               tonnara.    Often  in  these  situations  fish  facts  are  strategically  mobilised  or  contested,  and


               matters of facts can turn to matters of conflict.

                       Yet, the term conflict can be limiting, which is why I use matters of concern, care and


               conflict to develop my analysis. First, conflict assumes an opposition among actors and so

               can  sideline  collaborations  that  do  occur  when  participants  come  together,  albeit  with

               differing concern or solutions for the future of fish and fishing cultures. An example is, when


               fishermen put forward a hypothesis about the influence of mistral winds on tuna migration

                                                                                               56
               and their entry into the traps, and then marine biologists put that hypothesis to test  (Addis et

               al. 2013). Through this collaboration scientists were able to prove a correlation between the

               strong and cold northwesterly mistral wind and the abundance of tuna coming into the traps


               (Addis  et  al.  2013).  The  term  environmental  conflict  can  also  deflect  our  attention  from

               things. Returning to San Pietro we see that amongst the people the assembly is thick with


               things – there is a bio-techno-cultural and affective ecology of marine life, synthetic nets, a

               sea  cage,  fattening  ranches,  underwater  cameras,  tagging  devices,  licenses,  quota,  hooks,


               boats, tins, tastes, evocative campaigns and newspaper articles. Scientists, tonnarotti, owners,

               traders,  coast  guards,  journalists,  fishermen,  tourists,  campaigners,  and  a  social  scientist

               gather around these things with diverse concerns and practices of caring. They survey, fish,


               eat, control, write about and campaign in relation to these things. Finally, by bringing the




                                                                                                      152
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169