Page 170 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 170

and  therefore  quota.  In  principle,  ICCAT  uses  scientific  assessments  to  determine

               management strategies including the allocation of TAC for the eastern stock (the stock in the


               Mediterranean), which in simple terms is ICCAT’s management strategy to keep the stock


               above the MSY. Eventually, through a highly political process, ICCAT sets the TAC, and

               then the TAC is distributed among EU tuna fishing nations, which then allocate quota to their

               fisheries. The end result is a set tonnage of tuna that a fishery can catch per year. The original


               quota is based on a percentage of the fishery’s previous catch, a controversial point I will take

               up further when considering the closure of the tonnara in Favignana.


                       This  is  a  clear  example  of  a  thing  that  is  framed  in  realpolitik  terms.  However,  in

               actuality, as I detail below, such fish facts are produced in specific socio-technical contexts,


               are  highly  debated  within  scientific  communities,  and  go  through  a  political  process

               involving fishery lobby groups with the economic and social capacity to push an agenda.

                       According to many marine scientists the data upon which stock assessments are made


               and management strategies put in place is highly problematic. ICCAT also notes that there

               are considerable data limitations for the period up to 2007 (ICCAT 2015b, p. 92). The data


                                                                       59
               problem  is  summarised  in  a  controversially  titled  paper   by  marine  scientist  Amoroso  di
               Natale.  This  is  not  a  traditional  scientific  paper,  he  states,  but  an  ‘attempt  to  bring  the


               discussion on the bluefin tuna along a rail of reality’ and account for the problems of data,

               knowledge and the status of the species (2010, p. 1005).	A major critique is the use of CPUE


               methods to assess stock (Addis et al. 2012a, p. 134; Fromentin & Powers 2005, p. 297; Di

               Natale 2010, p. 1012). The assumption is that a proportional change in CPUE will represent a


               proportional change in stock (FAO in Addis et al. 2012a, p. 134). For a number of reasons

               this is problematic. The main problem is this: CPUE for active capture methods that go in

               search for tuna (e.g. purse seines, longliners), poorly reflects the underlying dynamics of fish


               populations (Addis et al. 2012, p. 134). On this basis, some researchers argue that the tonnara




                                                                                                      158
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175