Page 173 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 173

control and surveillance (Fromentin et al. 2014, p. 9-10). Between 2006-2011 environmental

               NGOs  were  able  to  gain  some  power  to  influence  fishery  management  through  effective


               public education campaigns and thus advocate for the plight of tuna (Fromentin et al. 2014, p.


               12).  For example, environmental NGO WWF states they were ‘very influential in most of

               the decisions made by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas

               (ICCAT)’  (WWF  2016,  n.p.).  Greenpeace  say  they  have  kept  a  close  eye  on  tuna  and


               surrounding fishing practices in the Mediterranean: for example, the Rainbow Warrior and

               the  Esperanza  toured  the  Mediterranean  and  ‘exposed  the  near-collapse  of  Mediterranean


               tuna stocks’ (Greenpeace 2006, para. 1). Furthermore, Greenpeace have placed pressure on

               fishery management committees, including ICCAT, by attending meetings as well as writing


               submissions to demand better management strategies (Greenpeace 2006).

                       In relation to tuna and the tonnara, some NGOs performed a backflip. When stocks

               were under threat they changed their tack from calling the tonnara sustainable to taking a


               stance against any tuna fishing. According to Giuliano Greco, Greenpeace once advocated for

               the tonnara as a sustainable fishery but then changed its position. So when the EU cut quota


               and  Greco  asked  Greenpeace  for  assistance  it  was  to  no  effect.  Likewise,  Slow  Food  had

               supported traditional bluefin tuna products until 2008 when it took bottarga off its Presidium


                  62
               list .
                       During the period of the 2000s tuna facts were used for political ends both by fishery


               lobbyists  pushing  for  a  higher  TAC,  and  by  NGOs  pushing  for  conservative  management

               when stocks were showing signs of rebuilding (Fromentin et al. 2014, p. 12). NGOs framed


               the problem in no uncertain terms, regardless of the uncertainty inherent in the assessments.

               Media  followed  suit,  referring  to  NGOs  as  arbiters  of  the  stock  status  and  a  forceful

               opposition to commercial interests. In an article in The Times (UK) titled ‘Watchdog puts


               Bluefin Tuna at Risk of Extinction’, author Frank Pope quotes director of international policy




                                                                                                      161
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178