Page 6 - Sea-level change_2004
P. 6

ARTICLE IN PRESS
          1974                    K. Lambeck, A. Purcell / Quaternary Science Reviews 24 (2005) 1969–1988





















































          Fig. 1. (a) Relative sea-level change between 12 ka andpresent for the melting of the nominal ice sheets on a rigidearth. The equivalent sea level at
          12 ka BP is  54 m andacross the region water levels lie above this level because of the direct gravitational attraction of the water by the northern ice
          sheets. (b) The glacio-isostatic contribution Dz I g at 12 ka from the decay of the northern European ice for the nominal earth model. (c) Same as (b)
          but for the North American ice sheet. (d) Same as (b) but for the Alpine deglaciation. (e) The glacio-isostatic contribution at 12 ka BP from the total
          global ice sheets, including Antarctica and mountain glaciers, (f) Same as (e) but for 6 ka BP. In all model predictions, melting ceased at 6.8 ka BP.
          The black contours denote negative values, white contours positive values, and the zero contour is given by the dashed white line. In (d) the contour
          interval is 1.25 m andthe maximum value is  11 m. (At 6 ka BP, the maximum value for the central Alpine reboundis  3 m.) A small peripheral
          bulge develops around this alpine load with maximum deflection in central Italy of about 1 m at 12 ka (and 0.25 m at 6 ka BP).



           The total Dz I-g for all ice sheets, including an  that by 6 ka small positive values for Dz I-g are predicted
          Antarctic contribution, is illustratedin Figs. 1e andf  for the far-eastern Mediterranean where the long
          for 12 and6 ka, respectively. For the former epoch, the  wavelength direct attraction is of larger amplitude than
          change across the region from the glacial reboundalone  the deformational contribution. Other than here, the
          ranges from about  3 m in the eastern Mediterranean to  glacio-isostatic effect across the region is mostly one of a
          about  12 m for the northern Adriatic Sea and the   rising level in Late Holocene time, even when ocean
          French Mediterranean coast. Under the influence of the  volumes have remainedconstant since 6.8 ka BP.
          Alpine rebound, the gradient changes sign in both the
          northern Adriatic Sea and the Gulf of Genoa, and the  3.3. Hydro-isostatic contribution
          largest magnitudes for Dz I-g actually occurs in the
          central northern Adriatic. The pattern illustrated in  Figs. 2a andb illustrate the hydro-isostatic contribu-
          Figs. 1e andf persists for much of the Holocene except  tion Dz I-h across the region at 12 ka BP. Two results are
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11