Page 6 - Badalamenti_Ramos_2000
P. 6

Cultural and socio-economic factors in marine protected areas  115

            dents and tourists. Amongst the residents, two sub-groups  Regulation is thus essential. Outside of the Mediterranean,
            will be considered, namely fishers and young people.  various strategies have been proposed, including education
                                                                (Kaza 1995), enforcement of controls and entrance fees which
            Resident fishers                                     increase with the level of protection (Alder 1996), or a combi-
            Fishers are probably amongst those most directly affected  nation of the above (Lindenberg & Huber 1993; Davis &
            when MPAs are established, especially in those localities  Tisdell 1996). The effect of MPAs on individual tourists will
            where a high degree of protection is instituted, for example in  depend on the relationships which they have with the MPAs
            cases where all activities are prohibited. The creation of  as well as the type of activity they intend to carry out in the
            MPAs results in a reduction in the size of fishing grounds,  localities concerned. These visitors can be divided into two
            causing legitimate resentment from fishers.          broad categories, namely those who benefit (the ‘winners’)
               A number of studies have demonstrated that in the long-  and those adversely affected (the ‘losers’).
            term, MPAs can cause overall increases in fish biomass  The ‘winning’ tourists are especially the new visitors who
            (Pipitone  et al. 1996; Russ & Alcala 1996), and there is  are attracted by publicity about MPAs and by the new facili-
            evidence that fish move out across MPAs boundaries as the  ties offered in and around the areas involved. They discover
            biomass accumulates (Roberts 1997). However, it can prove  a new environment and generally have no opportunity to
            difficult to convince fishers of the positive effects of MPAs on  make comparisons with the past. The arrival of these indi-
            fisheries. Difficulty can also be encountered in convincing  viduals is likely to be resented by ‘losers’. This new tourism,
            members of the fishing community of the economic benefits  together with all the recreational activities connected with it,
            to be gained from diversifying their work activities. MPA  should be regulated. Although tourism is believed to have a
            tourism offers many ways of supplementing income, for  lower impact than for example manufacturing industry, its
            example by leading boat tours and fishing trips, producing  excessive development is considered by many to have exerted
            handicrafts, providing holiday accommodation and meals for  negative effects on the benthic communities of MPAs if
            tourists, and offering services such as tank refilling for divers.  left uncontrolled (Sala  et al. 1996; Harriot  et al. 1997).
            The responses given in a questionnaire distributed to the  Particularly damaged are seagrass meadows (García Charton
            inhabitants of the Egadi Islands in Sicily by a local association  et al. 1993; Martinez et al. 1999), coelenterates and bryozoans
            reveal the great wariness felt by local fishers towards the  (Sala  et al. 1996; Zabala  et al. 1999) and intertidal assem-
            institution of the local MPA (Appendix 1).          blages (Kay & Little 1989). As many ‘winning’ tourists will
                                                                be very likely to fall into the category of mass tourism, they
            Resident young people                               should be the focus of attention of MPA planners and
            Young people can feel a strong identification with a site to  managers, so that any potentially deleterious effects on the
            which they have always enjoyed unlimited access. Being less  environment, the economy and, ultimately, the resident
            directly involved in the economic life of MPAs, they may be  community can be avoided.
            less aware of the benefits brought by the creation of MPAs and  The ‘losers’ include habitual visitors who often have
            are more likely to resent restrictions placed on their access.  strong attachments to wilderness and related values. This
            This group must be kept well-informed and encouraged to  group may feel resentment at the restrictions placed on their
            use MPAs in more compatible ways, whilst being made aware  use of MPAs and towards new visitors. The former stand to
            of the opportunities that MPAs can offer. Such opportunities  lose not only physical space but any sense of tranquillity that
            are many and include involvement with MPA management,  originally attracted them. Such individuals will be forced to
            diving centres, diving and snorkel guiding, tourist boat trips,  change their use of the spaces involved and are likely to feel
            hotels and hostels, conference centres, outdoor equipment  discouraged from continuing to visit MPAs. In this group we
            shops, local natural products, handicrafts, books, photog-  include the recreational fishers who may find restrictions on
            raphy, films and restaurants offering local cuisine.  the use of hooks and other small gear unacceptable. Conflict
            Educational activities such as sea-watching, nature trips and  may arise between this group and environmentalists who
            fieldwork courses can also be offered. It seems highly desir-  object to the sport on ethical grounds.
            able that local communities involve themselves in exploiting  Recreational users must be encouraged to make their
            the economic potential of MPAs. If they are unwilling to do  voices heard and to involve themselves in the planning and
            so, outsiders will move in and take over the task, causing ties  realization of MPAs. This category of person is generally
            between local communities and MPAs to be loosened.  sensitive to the issues involved and may be especially recep-
                                                                tive to educational programmes; the imposition of
            Tourists                                            restrictions on the activities of such people may prove unnec-
            In remote areas, tourism can be considered necessary for the  essary (Alder 1996).
            success of MPAs. The revenues from activities connected to
            tourism can be vital for depressed economies (Richez 1991,
                                                                MPAs in accessible localities and the north
            1993) but they can have negative impacts if, as has been shown
            in several cases, either the biological or social carrying capac-  There are few MPAs in accessible localities in the EU
            ities of the areas involved are exceeded (Dixon et al. 1993).  Mediterranean (Appendix 1). Amongst these we can include
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11